Pedagogy, Andragogy, And Heutagogy: Differences And Relevance For 21st Century Teachers

Pedagogi, Andragogi, Dan Heutagogi: Perbedaan Dan Relevansinya Bagi Guru Abad Ke-21

Authors

  • Mutmainnah Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Muntahy, Indonesia
  • Okik Dwi Cahyani Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Linda Afriani Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65663/timejournal.v1i2.82

Keywords:

Pedagogy, Andragogy, Heutagogy, 21st Century Teachers

Abstract

This study was conducted with the aim of determining the differences in pedagogical, andragogical, and heutagogical learning theories. Heutagogical theory is a continuum of pedagogy and andragogy. Based on the understanding of the PAH continuum (Pedagogy-Andragogy-Heutagogy), we want to determine the relevance of the PAH learning theory to the characteristics of teachers in the 21st century. The research method used is a literature review with the aim of determining the concepts of various literatures related to the PAH continuum and the suitability or not of the learning theory with 21st century teachers. The results of this study indicate that pedagogical theory focuses on the teacher-centered learning process and is not centered on students. Andragogical theory is a learning process that emphasizes that to become active learners, they need to independently plan their learning needs and know how they obtain and feel satisfied. Heutagogical theory emphasizes that students have full autonomy in the learning process in the classroom by creating an active and enjoyable learning atmosphere for them. Learning in the 21st century demands innovation so that education should not impose limitations on learners to be able to expand their knowledge, so that for teachers the theory of andragogy is still considered relevant for 21st century learning, while heutagogy is more suitable for learning in higher education.

References

Aartun, I., Walseth, K., Standal, Ø. F., & Kirk, D. (2022). Pedagogies of embodiment in physical education–a literature review. Sport, Education and Society, 27(1), 1-13.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1821182

Ashfarina, I. N., & Soedjarwo, S. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PAUD). EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 1355-1364.

https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.442

Azainil, A., Komariyah, L., & Yan, Y. (2021). The Effect of Principals' Managerial Competence and Teacher Discipline on Teacher Productivity. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 563-579.

https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i2.5634

Bale, A. S., Ghorpade, N., Hashim, M. F., Vaishnav, J., & Almaspoor, Z. (2022). A comprehensive study on metaverse and its impacts on humans. Advances in Human‐Computer Interaction, 2022(1), 3247060.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3247060

Bansal, A., Jain, S., Sharma, L., Sharma, N., Jain, C., & Madaan, M. (2020). Students’ perception regarding pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy as teaching–learning methods in undergraduate medical education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9(1), 301.

https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_221_20

Bayley, S. H. (2022). Learning for adaptation and 21st-century skills: Evidence of pupils’ flexibility in Rwandan primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 93, 102642.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102642

Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational theory, 70(1), 89-104.

https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411

Blaschke, L. M. (2021). The dynamic mix of heutagogy and technology: Preparing learners for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1629-1645.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13105

Blaschke, L. M. (2021). The dynamic mix of heutagogy and technology: Preparing learners for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1629-1645.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13105

Bouchrika, I. (2024). The andragogy approach: Knowles’ adult learning theory principles in 2024. Education.

Bratianu, C., Hadad, S., & Bejinaru, R. (2020). Paradigm shift in business education: a competence-based approach. Sustainability, 12(4), 1348.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041348

Bremner, N., Sakata, N., & Cameron, L. (2022). The outcomes of learner-centred pedagogy: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 94, 102649.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102649

Chang, Y. M., & Lai, C. L. (2021). Exploring the experiences of nursing students in using immersive virtual reality to learn nursing skills. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104670.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104670

Cremin, T., & Chappell, K. (2021). Creative pedagogies: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 299-331.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677757

Espino-Díaz, L., Fernandez-Caminero, G., Hernandez-Lloret, C. M., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, H., & Alvarez-Castillo, J. L. (2020). Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on education professionals. Toward a paradigm shift: ICT and neuroeducation as a binomial of action. Sustainability, 12(14), 5646.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145646

González-Salamanca, J. C., Agudelo, O. L., & Salinas, J. (2020). Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills. A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(24), 10366.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410366

Gore, J., & Rosser, B. (2022). Beyond content-focused professional development: powerful professional learning through genuine learning communities across grades and subjects. Professional development in education, 48(2), 218-232.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1725904

Hägg, G., & Kurczewska, A. (2020). Guiding the student entrepreneur–Considering the emergent adult within the pedagogy–andragogy continuum in entrepreneurship education. Education+ Training, 62(7/8), 759-777.

https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2020-0069

Hägg, G., & Kurczewska, A. (2020). Guiding the student entrepreneur–Considering the emergent adult within the pedagogy–andragogy continuum in entrepreneurship education. Education+ Training, 62(7/8), 759-777.

https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2020-0069

Moore, M. (2020). On a theory of independent study. In Distance Education (pp. 68-94). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003033950-8

Moore, R. L. (2020). Developing lifelong learning with heutagogy: contexts, critiques, and challenges. Distance Education, 41(3), 381-401.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1766949

Nguyen, A., Lämsä, J., Dwiarie, A., & Järvelä, S. (2024). Lifelong learner needs for human-centered self-regulated learning analytics. Information and Learning Sciences, 125(1/2), 68-108.

https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-07-2023-0091

Ouyang, F., Dai, X., & Chen, S. (2022). Applying multimodal learning analytics to examine the immediate and delayed effects of instructor scaffoldings on small groups’ collaborative programming. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 45.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00361-z

Ravanis, K. (2022). Research trends and development perspectives in Early Childhood Science Education: an overview. Education Sciences, 12(7), 456.

https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070456

Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational psychologist, 56(1), 54-77.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657

Robinson, J. D., & Persky, A. M. (2020). Developing self-directed learners. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 84(3), 847512.

https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe847512

Susanto, R., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rachbini, W. (2020). Technological and Pedagogical models. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/311

Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: the importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational review, 73(1), 71-97.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247

Tuncer, H. (2024). The role of andragogy in professional development as perceived by EFL instructors in higher education context (Doctoral dissertation).

Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo, M. D. C., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009–2018). Sustainability, 12(12), 5153.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125153

Vlachopoulos, D., Thorkelsdóttir, R. B., Schina, D., & Jónsdóttir, J. G. (2023). Teachers’ experience and perceptions of sustainable digitalization in school education: an existential phenomenological study of teachers in Romania, Greece, Cyprus, Iceland, and The Netherlands. Sustainability, 15(18), 13353.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813353

Vossoughi, S., Davis, N. R., Jackson, A., Echevarria, R., Muñoz, A., & Escudé, M. (2021). Beyond the binary of adult versus child centered learning: Pedagogies of joint activity in the context of making. Cognition and Instruction, 39(3), 211-241.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1860052

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Mutmainnah, Cahyani, O. D., & Afriani, L. (2024). Pedagogy, Andragogy, And Heutagogy: Differences And Relevance For 21st Century Teachers: Pedagogi, Andragogi, Dan Heutagogi: Perbedaan Dan Relevansinya Bagi Guru Abad Ke-21. Transformation of Islamic Management and Education, 1(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.65663/timejournal.v1i2.82

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)