The Effectiveness of the Lecture Method on Islamic Religious Education Students' Learning Outcomes in the Keaswajaan Course: A Quantitative Study Efektivitas Metode Ceramah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa PAI Dalam Mata Kuliah Keaswajaan: Studi Kuantitatif
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the lecture method on student learning outcomes in the Islamic Religious Education (PAI) Study Program, specifically in the Keaswajaan course at Sunan Giri University Surabaya. The Keaswajaan course plays a critical role in shaping students' moderate Islamic character through historical and ideological content. Despite being considered conventional, the lecture method remains widely used in Islamic studies. A quantitative approach was employed, involving all second-semester PAI students participating in the Field Introduction Program (PPL), totaling 35 individuals. Data were collected through questionnaires, documentation, and observation, and analyzed using Yule’s Q formula to determine the strength of the relationship between students’ responses to the lecture method and their academic achievement. The findings indicate a strong positive correlation (Q = 0.784), suggesting that students who responded positively to the lecture method tended to achieve higher learning outcomes. The study recommends that the lecture method be developed in a more interactive and contextual manner to enhance its effectiveness in higher religious education settings.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alam, M. K. (2021). A systematic qualitative case study: questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1-31.
https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825
Aseery, A. (2024). Enhancing learners’ motivation and engagement in religious education classes at elementary levels. British Journal of Religious Education, 46(1), 43-58.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2256487
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367-1385.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
Choi, J. J., Robb, C. A., Mifli, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2021). University students’ perception to online class delivery methods during the COVID-19 pandemic: A focus on hospitality education in Korea and Malaysia. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100336.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100336
Harlap, Y., & Riese, H. (2022). “We don’t throw stones, we throw flowers”: race discourse and race evasiveness in the Norwegian university classroom. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 45(7), 1218-1238.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2021.1904146
Harrison, R., Meyer, L., Rawstorne, P., Razee, H., Chitkara, U., Mears, S., & Balasooriya, C. (2022). Evaluating and enhancing quality in higher education teaching practice: A meta-review. Studies in Higher Education, 47(1), 80-96.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1730315
Holbrey, C. E. (2020). Kahoot! Using a game-based approach to blended learning to support effective learning environments and student engagement in traditional lecture theatres. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 191-202.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737568
Howard, N. J. (2023). Lecturer professional identities in gamification: A socio-material perspective. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(3), 476-492.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2086569
Howell, R. A. (2021). Engaging students in education for sustainable development: The benefits of active learning, reflective practices and flipped classroom pedagogies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 325, 129318.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129318
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2023). Facilitating decision-making performances in nursing treatments: a contextual digital game-based flipped learning approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 156-171.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1765391
Jain, N. (2021). Survey versus interviews: Comparing data collection tools for exploratory research. The Qualitative Report, 26(2), 541-554.
https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4492
Jin, S., & Peng, L. (2022). Classroom perception in higher education: The impact of spatial factors on student satisfaction in lecture versus active learning classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 941285.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941285
Lee, J., Park, T., & Davis, R. O. (2022). What affects learner engagement in flipped learning and what predicts its outcomes?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 211-228.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12717
Ludvigsen, K., Johan Krumsvik, R., & Breivik, J. (2020). Behind the scenes: Unpacking student discussion and critical reflection in lectures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2478-2494.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12922
Mavuru, L., & Ramnarain, U. (2020). Learners’ socio-cultural backgrounds and science teaching and learning: A case study of township schools in South Africa. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(4), 1067-1095.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09974-8
McQueen, H. A., & McMillan, C. (2020). Quectures: Personalised constructive learning in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 217-231.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418760325
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Nashir, M., & Laili, R. N. (2021). Hybrid learning as an effective learning solution on intensive English program in the new normal era. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9(2), 220232-220232.
https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i2.2253
Onowugbeda, F. U., Okebukola, P. A., Agbanimu, D. O., Ajayi, O. A., Oladejo, A. I., Awaah, F., ... & Ige, A. M. (2024). Can the culturo-techno-contextual approach (CTCA) promote students’ meaningful learning of concepts in variation and evolution?. Research in Science & Technological Education, 42(2), 395-411.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2084060
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893-7925.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1-O16.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
Pesämaa, O., Zwikael, O., HairJr, J., & Huemann, M. (2021). Publishing quantitative papers with rigor and transparency. International Journal of Project Management, 39(3), 217-222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.03.001
Razali, R., Sundana, L., & Ramli, R. (2024). Curriculum development in higher education in light of culture and religiosity: A case study in Aceh of Indonesia. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(1), 39-55.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2448349
Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Ulfa, S. (2023). Creative problem solving process instructional design in the context of blended learning in higher education. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 21(2), 80-97.
https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.2.2653
Sewart, D. (2020). Distance teaching: a contradiction in terms?. In Distance education (pp. 46-61). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003033950-5
Weatherton, M., & Schussler, E. E. (2021). Success for all? A call to re-examine how student success is defined in higher education. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), es3.
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-09-0223
Zaim, M., Arsyad, S., Waluyo, B., Ardi, H., Al Hafizh, M., Zakiyah, M., ... & Hardiah, M. (2024). AI-powered EFL pedagogy: Integrating generative AI into university teaching preparation through UTAUT and activity theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100335.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335
Zen, Z., & Ariani, F. (2022). Academic achievement: the effect of project-based online learning method and student engagement. Heliyon, 8(11).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11509
Zeng, H. L., Chen, D. X., Li, Q., & Wang, X. Y. (2020). Effects of seminar teaching method versus lecture-based learning in medical education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medical teacher, 42(12), 1343-1349.